Comments on: Are Extension Methods Useful for Normal Programming Tasks? http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2007/12/09/are-extension-methods-useful-for-normal-programming-tasks/ Thoughts on programming and other things Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:34:26 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: zak http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2007/12/09/are-extension-methods-useful-for-normal-programming-tasks/comment-page-1/#comment-2812 zak Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:16:40 +0000 http://blog.darrenstokes.com/?p=19#comment-2812 Hi! Nice site, and nice intro to extensions. I've also started liking them. You can work an extension object into your logging solution, which makes logging exceptions as easy as exceptionInstance.Log();. I've written about it here http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/ExtensionsAndAlog.aspx Thanx Hi!
Nice site, and nice intro to extensions. I’ve also started liking them. You can work an extension object into your logging solution, which makes logging exceptions as easy as exceptionInstance.Log();. I’ve written about it here http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/ExtensionsAndAlog.aspx

Thanx

]]> By: celpjefscycle http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2007/12/09/are-extension-methods-useful-for-normal-programming-tasks/comment-page-1/#comment-16 celpjefscycle Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:16:35 +0000 http://blog.darrenstokes.com/?p=19#comment-16 Thanks for information. many interesting things Celpjefscylc Thanks for information.
many interesting things
Celpjefscylc

]]> By: twalker http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2007/12/09/are-extension-methods-useful-for-normal-programming-tasks/comment-page-1/#comment-5 twalker Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:11:49 +0000 http://blog.darrenstokes.com/?p=19#comment-5 Hey, thanks for the clarification! Hey, thanks for the clarification!

]]> By: Darren Stokes http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2007/12/09/are-extension-methods-useful-for-normal-programming-tasks/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Darren Stokes Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:27:41 +0000 http://blog.darrenstokes.com/?p=19#comment-4 Well, technically both are correct. Microsoft has decided to make the version numbering scheme for the entire development tool suite as complicated as possible. C# is versioned separately, according to the language standand. Since the C# language did not change for .Net 3.0, the version of the language was still 2.0. The language additions that are included in VS.net 2008 have revised the language version to 3.0. The .Net libary edition that is new with VS.net 2008 is .Net 3.5. Well, technically both are correct. Microsoft has decided to make the version numbering scheme for the entire development tool suite as complicated as possible.

C# is versioned separately, according to the language standand. Since the C# language did not change for .Net 3.0, the version of the language was still 2.0. The language additions that are included in VS.net 2008 have revised the language version to 3.0.

The .Net libary edition that is new with VS.net 2008 is .Net 3.5.

]]> By: twalker http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2007/12/09/are-extension-methods-useful-for-normal-programming-tasks/comment-page-1/#comment-3 twalker Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:21:31 +0000 http://blog.darrenstokes.com/?p=19#comment-3 Darren, In the text above you stated that with the release of VS 2008 they also release c# 3.0 but I thought it was .net 3.5. Which one is correct? Nice blog site! Thanks, TW Darren,

In the text above you stated that with the release of VS 2008 they also release c# 3.0 but I thought it was .net 3.5. Which one is correct? Nice blog site!

Thanks,
TW

]]>