<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mono 2.0 (.Net 2.0 compatible) is coming soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2008/03/13/mono-20-net-20-compatible-is-coming-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2008/03/13/mono-20-net-20-compatible-is-coming-soon/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on programming and other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:17:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hansen</title>
		<link>http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2008/03/13/mono-20-net-20-compatible-is-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2008/03/13/mono-20-net-20-compatible-is-coming-soon/#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Howdy, just as a fact; we&#039;re creating an Ajax for ASP.NET library which is targeting .Net 2.0 and just as a fact, every single of our samples from here; http://ajaxwidgets.com/AllControlsSamples/ are already running on Mono 1.2.6 version so Mono is already mostly .Net 2.0 compatible :)

kind regards,
Thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdy, just as a fact; we&#8217;re creating an Ajax for ASP.NET library which is targeting .Net 2.0 and just as a fact, every single of our samples from here; <a href="http://ajaxwidgets.com/AllControlsSamples/" rel="nofollow">http://ajaxwidgets.com/AllControlsSamples/</a> are already running on Mono 1.2.6 version so Mono is already mostly .Net 2.0 compatible <img src='http://blog.darrenstokes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>kind regards,<br />
Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel de Icaza</title>
		<link>http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2008/03/13/mono-20-net-20-compatible-is-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel de Icaza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2008/03/13/mono-20-net-20-compatible-is-coming-soon/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>There are some reasons to run Mono on Windows, here are some of the use cases:

* Same runtime across all platforms, no need to test across multiple platforms with different runtimes if your product is mostly cross-platform.

* Small download size: you can bring Mono down to a couple of megs for download and you can bundle it as part of your application (For instance Unity&#039;s web plugin does this). 

* Allows deployment when the .NET framework can not be installed due to IT policies (we have a few users that bundle their application with Mono as the .NET runtime is not available everywhere).

And lastly:

* It helps us ensure that Mono remains cross platform by ensuring that the we always make architectural decisions that are sound cross-platform wise.  Maintaining a Windows version has helped towards this goal and is part of what makes Mono easy to port.

best wishes,
Miguel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some reasons to run Mono on Windows, here are some of the use cases:</p>
<p>* Same runtime across all platforms, no need to test across multiple platforms with different runtimes if your product is mostly cross-platform.</p>
<p>* Small download size: you can bring Mono down to a couple of megs for download and you can bundle it as part of your application (For instance Unity&#8217;s web plugin does this). </p>
<p>* Allows deployment when the .NET framework can not be installed due to IT policies (we have a few users that bundle their application with Mono as the .NET runtime is not available everywhere).</p>
<p>And lastly:</p>
<p>* It helps us ensure that Mono remains cross platform by ensuring that the we always make architectural decisions that are sound cross-platform wise.  Maintaining a Windows version has helped towards this goal and is part of what makes Mono easy to port.</p>
<p>best wishes,<br />
Miguel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BusinessRx Reading List</title>
		<link>http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2008/03/13/mono-20-net-20-compatible-is-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>BusinessRx Reading List</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darrenstokes.com/2008/03/13/mono-20-net-20-compatible-is-coming-soon/#comment-248</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Restarting VisualStudioHacks.com...&lt;/strong&gt;

Back when I wrote Visual Studio Hacks the book I also started the companion site, I kept up for awhile...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Restarting VisualStudioHacks.com&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Back when I wrote Visual Studio Hacks the book I also started the companion site, I kept up for awhile&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
